Skip to content

Fix block description In-consistency #69478

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for

By clicking “Sign up for ”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on ? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix block description In-consistency #69478

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Infinite-Null
Copy link
Contributor

@Infinite-Null Infinite-Null commented Mar 6, 2025•
edited
Loading

Closes: #69475

What?

This PR standardizes block descriptions in the /packages/block-library directory, ensuring verb tense and structure consistency.

Why?

Some descriptions use different verb tenses (e.g., “Display” vs. “Displays”). This PR aims to standardize descriptions using a third-person verb format where applicable.

How?

  • Updated descriptions that start with a verb to use third-person singular (e.g., “Displays” instead of “Display”).
  • Ensured consistency across all block descriptions in the block library.

Testing Instructions

  1. Search for the description in block.json in /packages/block-library.
  2. Also you can open the block editor and inspect block descriptions in the block settings panel.
  3. Compare the description changes to ensure consistency.

@Infinite-NullInfinite-Null marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 06:36
@github-actionsGitHub Actions
Copy link

-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2025

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

If you're merging code through a pull request on , copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Co-authored-by: Infinite-Null <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: afercia <[email protected]>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@Infinite-Null
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @afercia,
I have made the block description consistent please review it at your convenience.
Thank You!

@t-hamanot-hamano added [Type] CopyIssues or PRs that need copy editing assistance[Package] Block library/packages/block-librarylabels Mar 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on . Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@artemiomorales artemiomorales Awaiting requested review from artemiomoralesartemiomorales is a code owner

@ZebulanStanphill ZebulanStanphill Awaiting requested review from ZebulanStanphillZebulanStanphill is a code owner

@ajitbohra ajitbohra Awaiting requested review from ajitbohraajitbohra is a code owner

@fabiankaegy fabiankaegy Awaiting requested review from fabiankaegyfabiankaegy is a code owner

@juanmaguitar juanmaguitar Awaiting requested review from juanmaguitarjuanmaguitar is a code owner

@ndiego ndiego Awaiting requested review from ndiegondiego is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[Package] Block library/packages/block-library[Type] CopyIssues or PRs that need copy editing assistance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Blocks descriptions use inconsistent verb person and pattern
2 participants
@Infinite-Null @t-hamano